In all of human history, the current era stands out for radical innovation. The ongoing AI era is poised to quickly change the world on a more radical level through innovation than what has been done in any previous era.Reflecting on past breakthroughs like the original iPhone, which addressed issues unbeknownst to users, it becomes apparent that such innovations merely scratch the surface of what’s coming. The future holds the promise of even more groundbreaking advancements that will redefine everything in the years ahead.If you wanted to be a part of the radical innovations that happened in prior tech booms,…
Here’s a post about how I am considering a venture for an Omnilow AI.
Below is the video I added to my AI With Omnilow post at SS5.org/2025/02/06/AI-with-omnilow as a continued example for the following segment in that post.”Even if AI became better than humans at inferring data from natural language, Omnilow would still often be superior to natural language. Inferred data from natural language is often going to be wrong regardless of how smart the AI might be. For many complex systems, almost nothing from the understanding can be wrong or it throws everything off.For example, “There are two companies. One company has loans which is all financially sound. For the other company,…
This post was made to alert anyone interested that my AI With Omnilow post at SS5.org/2025/02/06/AI-with-omnilow was majorly updated yesterday.
This post is outdated. Please refer to SS5.org/Omnilow-AI for up-to-date information. As I discussed in my AI With Omnilow post, I believe Omnilow algorithmic language is the most effective language for people to interact with AI in many contexts, for two AIs to communicate in some cases, and for a single AI to use within itself in certain situations. I am considering creating an AI product that is designed for Omnilow inputs and Omnilow outputs for consumers or for AIs.If I decide to create that AI product, I would be interested in partnering with someone partly responsible for building the…
This post might be outdated and has been replaced with my EOS Visionary page. Please refer to that page at SamSauer.org/EOS-Visionary. I am an EOS Visionary who is looking for an EOS Visionary who is overwhelmed, an EOS Integrator, or a company replacing their current EOS Visionary. I would act as a full-time or part-time/fractional EOS Visionary.Let’s break down what I’d do for each of those. If you’re an EOS Visionary Most EOS companies only have one Visionary who sits at the top, ignoring Visionaries who operate as a subordinate. As offerings multiply, a product/service line may merit its own…
The best chess player was not an AI.The best chess player was an AI with a human (a Centaur Team).Chess engines (AKA chess AIs) determined how good/bad a move is by analyzing the possible positions resulting from that move, and then comparing them to the other possible positions resulting from other possible moves.Chess engines didn’t genuinely understand position dynamics like a Grandmaster did, and that led to some positions where a Grandmaster has a better strategy than an engine due to the limits of such brute force.Chess engines didn’t look at position and think, ‘Hmm, this is a really closed…
Here’s my post about economics and the dangers and opportunities for abundant EAGI (embodied artificial general intelligence).
Economics is only about who owns what and how those assets are used. Even abundant EAGI (embodied artificial general intelligence) won’t change that. Control assets, apply efficiency, hope for luck; that equation doesn’t change.Active income = renting the only asset you can’t store, your time. Engineers, landlords, founders all do it. Passive income just substitutes someone else’s time (or eventually, an EAGI’s).We’re nowhere near AGI (artificial general intelligence) yet, but imagine EAGIs (robots controlled by AGI) becoming as abundant as smartphones.When EAGIs outperform humans at everything, the key question is who owns them. Own even one EAGI unit, and you…
Here’s the link to the condensed version of this post. It’s about ownership. Even abundant EAGI (embodied artificial general intelligence) could never change that.Regardless of what happens with AI in the coming decades, it will still only be about ownership, as it always has been and always will be.The only goal in business is getting the most ROI from the resources you own. Efficiency (and luck) are the only ways someone might outperform another person.Economics is only about who owns what and how people/entities use what they own.Active income (whether as an employee or an entrepreneur) is just trading ownership…